The Norwegian Shooter: Neither Christian Nor Right-Winger

Prodos investigates the writings of the Norwegian shooter, and demonstrates, that, contrary to the dominant media narrative, he is neither a "Christian fundamentalist" nor a "right-winger":

It is believed the document titled “2083: A European Declaration of Independence” by Andrew Berwick is the manifesto of Norwegian shooter, Anders Behring Breivik.

Based on this document it is claimed by some that Breivik is a “Christian fundamentalist”.

He’s not.

On page 1307 he writes:

"If you have a personal relationship with Jesus Christ and God then you are a religious Christian. Myself and many more like me do not necessarily have a personal relationship with Jesus Christ and God. We do however believe in Christianity as a cultural, social, identity and moral platform. This makes us Christian."

Despite the “conclusion” presented, the above statement establishes that he’s not any sort of Christian.

If one doesn’t have a “personal relationship” with Jesus or God, on what basis can one be a “Christian”?

In any case he’s not a “fundamentalist” Christian.

He does not support separation of Church and State

Pg 1405

I fully support that the Church gains more or less monopoly on religion in Europe (government policies, school curriculum etc at least) in addition to granting the Church several concessions which have been taken from them the last decades.

Pg 1375

Q: Is it possible that cultural conservatives and National Socialists will cooperate in the future?

A: … the solution is not to reject Christianity but rather to reform Christianity to re-introduce the concepts of “self-defence” as propagated by former Crusader Popes.

Pg 1309

It is essential that we preserve and even strengthen the Church and European Christendom in general (by awarding it more political influence on certain areas), when it comes to the moral, cultural and social aspects of society. It should even be granted

monopoly on certain areas to strengthen European cohesion/unity ..

It is claimed by some that he’s a free market proponent.

He’s not.

He’s in fact a proponent of the Welfare State.

Pg 1224:

We believe in cultural monoculturalism and to a large degree ethnocentrism because we know that is the only proven way of preserving social cohesion levels is required to facilitate a welfare state. Without social cohesion, no welfare state.

… The reason there is not a decent welfare system in the US is because of lack of social cohesion.

Pg 1195:

…. we should attempt to follow the Scandinavian welfare model to a certain degree to ensure a solid welfare program to all European citizens.