EXCLUSIVE:
by Allan Essery
Part 1 - Agenda 21 again
Awareness of the environment and concern for its delicate balance are indeed sensible endeavours. Concern, however, arose during a 1992 United Nation's conference to discuss future environmentally friendly development. From that conference an action agenda was revealed for an innocuously sounding aim of ''Sustainable Development''. That agenda was known as Agenda 21 and not as innocuous as it sounded.
Agenda 21 was promoted as a non-binding and voluntarily implemented action plan, and so the lie began. It was also called the brainchild of a group of powerful elitists known as the Club of Rome. Their aim was world domination brought about using the United Nations and its agencies to create a World Government together with a World Bank and a Security Force to ensure implementation of its aims.
Far from being a non-binding and voluntary action plan the following was the reality for those that signed on, ''This global contract binds all nations and spreading regions to the collective vision of "sustainable development." They must commit to pursue the three E's of "sustainability": Environment, Economy and Equity’’, referring to the UN blueprint for environmental regulation, economic control, and redistribution of wealth.
Sold to the world’s nations as a plan for creating sustainable societies 176 governments around the world, including Australia, saw it as a means of social justice and a healthy planet. Initially, few if any were awake to their lies and doomsday scenarios, the pseudo-science and the unimaginable costs that came with this elaborate and fraudulent con.
Had any of the worlds leaders caught up in the lie bothered to undertake just a little research, or even given it some considered thought, they would have realised as did others that, “Marxist economics has never worked. Socialism produces poverty, not prosperity. Collectivism creates oppression, not freedom. Trusting environmental "scientists" who depend on government funding and must produce politically useful "information" will lead to economic and social disaster.''
Back in1992 when Agenda 21 was born there was not yet the hysterical knee-jerk reactions of the alarmist's ''carbon pollution'' and ''man-made climate change'' and so these lies were cleverly created by the UN and its agencies to justify their ''sustainable development'' agenda.
The UN very effectively, but falsely, enhanced the illusion when the Secretary General of their Earth division said, ''Current lifestyles and consumption patterns of the affluent middleclass – involving high meat intake, use of fossil fuels, appliances, home and work air conditioning, and suburban housing are not sustainable.''
In line with this propaganda, new buzzwords came into being. Words such as sustainable development, environmentally sustainable, future earth, smart growth, and biodiversity. Phenomena such as climate change were promoted as man-made disasters while naturally occurring climate change was conveniently ignored.
To achieve the aims of Agenda 21 it would be necessary to undertake the mammoth task of reprogramming the human race. Human rights as we know them would have to be removed for the good of the collective.
The UN plans to rid the world of poverty as a means of controlling the world's population; but how are they going to achieve that? Well, they have already surreptitiously commenced a redistribution of wealth from affluent nations to the poorer nations. Think about Carbon Tax and where all the proceeds go. Think about the transfer of manufacturing from affluent manufacturing nations to poorer nations. Think about where Australia's manufacturing and farming assets have gone. Think about the lowering of trade barriers and tariffs to bring that about. And, think about the redistribution of the population of poorer countries to the more affluent nations.
To achieve its intended agenda the UN will attempt to coerce the world's governments into surrendering the sovereignty of their nations. They hope to achieve a quiet transition through which our individual freedoms would be stripped away. Your children would become the sole property of the ''State'' and you would have no say in their upbringing, their education, or their future. You would not be allowed to own any property and nor would you be allowed to choose where you live.
The United Nations is fearful that more and more of the world's population will realise what is happening and fight against it. They would be ecstatic that some would be sucked into their deception and support Agenda 21 by labelling those against the agenda as ''Conspiracy Alarmists'' and the UN will seek to discredit them and any elected official who undertakes to work against them.
All good stuff though not helped by a couple of typos ie "Agenda 2" appears twice V's "Agenda 21" ?
Posted by: Jim Simpson | October 4, 2013 at 01:26 PM
We need this information spread far and wide. I have been talking about this for some time now but feel like a candle in the wind as the world media is so leftist that they do not wish this information to get out. Stuff like this would never be known by any but the people trying to implement the Agenda 21 policy if not for the internet and a few brave souls that actually have some voice.
Posted by: Jim Witt | October 4, 2013 at 04:28 PM
Jim, this is the first part of a 4 part series that will demonstrate just how the tentacles of the UN are reaching for control of every aspect of life as we know it and are being aided and abetted by Australian governments both Federal and State. I be grateful if you and others would following it to the end and spread the word.
Posted by: Allan | October 4, 2013 at 05:57 PM
The Australian Federal,State and local governments in implementing what is being touted as an innocuous UN objective, its Agenda 21, are removing by stealth all incentive for private land ownership. In WA, (and other states), massive amounts of private land is being resumed on the pretext of its environmental public benefit with the government paying just 30% of its unaffected market value leaving those land owners financially destitute unable to replace their land and homes. Most of those affected cannot afford the exorbitant costs of a legal challenge. This is whilst the government is developing on existing pristine irreplaceable heritage valued wet lands.
This is Australian democracy and justice.
Posted by: Ralph | October 5, 2013 at 07:11 PM