EXCLUSIVE:
Sustainable Development?
by Allan Essery. Part 2
Resulting from an enormous volume of evidence gathered by a small army of those suspicious of the intent of the Club of Rome and the United Nations it becomes very clear that there was and currently is a plan to undertake the greatest act of socialist treason ever visited upon mankind.
AGW hysteria was created as means of the UN achieving its intended goal and it was said, “in searching for a new enemy to unite us, we came up with the idea that pollution, the threat of global warming, water shortages, famine and the like would fit the bill.'' They went on to say, ''It does not matter if this common enemy is a real one or one invented for the purpose.”
In introducing the latest buzz word ''Future Earth'' the UN and its agencies have a global plan to:
• Research and develop methods to control food, water, energy.
• Utilise technology, sciences and economics fraudulently to create an illusion.
• Pressure governments and law makers to support their efforts.
• Manifest agendas with academics and corporations to appropriate funds and control production.
• Control under-developed nations by forcing ''sustainable'' technologies.
The success or failure of UN intentions to impose upon mankind total control of every aspect of human life is reliant upon the specific so-called ''sustainability'' orientated education of children from very young ages and the reeducation of adults – the dumbing down of mankind. In this endeavour the UN Agenda 21, and Common Core, exponents are prepared to use all methods available to them to get their message over and bring about the early education of children and the reprogramming of mankind.
One father in the US was alarmed to learn what his 5 year old daughter was being taught by her public school. ''Daddy . . ., today we learned that driving cars is making the ice caps to melt and all the polar bears die.'
It is worth noting that our former Prime Minister, Julia Gillard, is taking up a post with a US group-think institute to work on methods of ''Global Education''. There should be concern that people like Gillard are prepared to move Australia in the direction of ''one-size-fits-all'' approach to child education.
That madness extends far beyond the classrooms of your local school and even politicians, especially those of the socialist persuasion, are willingly jumping on the UN Agenda 21 band wagon, but they are not telling you.
The UN programme says, ''Countries and the United Nations system should promote a cooperative relationship with the media, popular theatre groups, and entertainment and advertising industries by initiating discussions to mobilize their experience in shaping public behaviour and consumption patterns . . .''
In the US a congresswoman, Barbara Lee, and friends are pushing a resolution that calls on Congress to, '' . . . recognize that climate change will hurt the plight of women more than men; driving women into “transactional sex” for survival — among other horrible fates.''
It won't take long for Emily's List and such feminist groups to pick up on this foolishness and it is alarming to think that should you debunk climate change, Agenda 21 or Common Core you stand a good chance of being accused of being part of a movement that forces women into prostitution!
Throughout the past 21 years the various governments Federal and State have failed to be up front with the Australian people. Agenda 21 has purposely not been mentioned and the Australian people certainly have not had a chance to learn of its full intentions nor have they had a chance to vote for or against.
On the other hand gullible politicians have been bewitched by the promises of globalisation. Alexander Downer once tried to send the Australian people on a guilt trip by suggesting that politics is no longer about left and right but about globalisation (World Government). He inferred that if you are an opponent of globalisation then you're a globaphobe and hate your country. ''The triumph of globaphobia would be a death note for Australia.'' Downer claimed.
Globaphobia means that Australia and its people come first, but according to Downer and those that think like him, Australia and Australians should come last and the globe first. It appears that Downer and like minds believe that there is no longer any place for democracy and we should all become drones of the United Nation's ''World Government'' and its agents. I believe that is bordering on treason.
I have said previously that there are also many socialists in the Liberal party, in fact most of them are in favour of centralized government and better control of the populace through dependency, taxation, propaganda, pap education, and punishment. This all fits nicely with the UN Agenda 21, and unless we are careful we will end up living in their socialist hell. I fear as so many of the youth, probably due to the current pap education, are so ignorant of history and ambivalent to current world events and national political events that it will be a race between the socialists and Islam for control of the whole world. The only real advantage's of having the Lib's in power is that history shows them to be better economic managers and overall better for the advancement of the nations wealth and the majority of the populaces prosperity. Other than that their is not a lot of difference between them and Labor.
Posted by: Jim Witt | October 17, 2013 at 10:05 AM
The final sentence says it all.
The 2 party system are both facilitators of Agenda 21-- sustainable development, they use the Delphi technic , good cop bad cop to achieve the outcome they want.
No wonder both parties are so similar.
The Liberal party in WA have been aware of Agenda 21 since 2002, and the influence from outer growth corridor councils , and nothing has changed.
Every aspect of life from birth to death is controlled by the chapters of Agenda 21.
Both parties just give you enough hope that you may prosper and the belief they offer democracy.
Posted by: linda | October 17, 2013 at 10:46 AM
I would just love to be an educator in literature these days. Required prior to a pass would be the reading and comprehension via examination the following works:
Nineteen Eighty-Four
Brave New World
Animal Farm
This Perfect Day
Atlas Shrugged
The Servile Mind
This along with some education on history in regard to:
Genghis Khan
The Crusades
Greek Empire
Roman Empire
Russian Revolution
WW1
WW2 and the holocaust
The cultural revolution
Just might produce the odd individual that could think for themselves instead of the ambivalent left leaning mob currently being mass produced.
Of course any educator today who tried to do the above would most likely be ostracized from every educational facility in the western world.
Posted by: Jim Witt | October 17, 2013 at 11:21 AM
How right you are, Allen, jim and Linda.
The MSM are either ignorant of SD A21 or complicit, and I put Bolt into that category as well as the IPA.
I only found out about SD A21 in 2010. It is so well hidden, it has many name given to it by governments both State and Federal and all local councils.
I remember when Gillard made Tony Burke the Minister for SD Peter Van Oneselen asking the question, what is sustainable development! What a joke.
When I heard Julie Bishop stand up before the UN 3 weeks afte the 2013 election and say "Australia supports Sustainable Development" I was almost physically sick. Why didn't you say the during the election Ms Bishop.
Australia supports sustainable development, really? NO WE DO NOT, the vast majority of the nation have no idea about SD those that do know of it have no idea it is a treaty from the unelected UN.
Posted by: Vivienne | October 17, 2013 at 12:38 PM
Yes Allen, you are right about Treason, just check out Sec, 44 of Our Australian Constitution!
Posted by: Vivienne | October 17, 2013 at 12:51 PM
G'Day Linda and thanks for your comment.
I believe that Paul Keating signed Australia up to Agenda 21 in 1992 and I have no doubt that key politicians at federal and state level were aware of what it was and what it meant - they just didn't explain it to the general public.
As the United Nations always intended that the initial implementation of Agenda 21 was to be undertaken by local councils it seems reasonable to assume that local councils were made aware of the requirements and implications and their part in the scheme of things at around the same time or shortly thereafter - they just didn't explain it to the general public.
It is interesting to look up Agenda 21 on Wikipedia. It is still being touted as a non-binding voluntary agreement despite what the United Nations themselves say about binding agreements. They must really think the average citizen is stupid and unable to put two and two together.
Posted by: Allan | October 17, 2013 at 01:51 PM
The average citizen has been conditioned into doing nothing until it is too late.
Keep education standards as low as possible and celebrity gossip is more newsworthy than boring financial statistics, game shows are more interesting than documentries and climate science becomes more believable than physics.
Keynesian economics was fully debunked by Margaret Thatcher, it has taken a generation of pretend education to bring it back as credible again.
Posted by: Anton | October 17, 2013 at 04:49 PM
.... there is no longer any place for democracy ... that is bordering on treason ....
Many a true word from the mouths of dopes, drunks and dawks.
"Democracy:" A flash word for Mob Rule.
Posted by: Brian_R_Allen | October 17, 2013 at 09:49 PM
Allan, in 2002 when I printed of the Agenda 21 program my council was using for private property resumptions, I took the documents in front of a full council, they all appeared shocked, I them went onto state opposition which was Liberals, I gave everything that was available on the net, they promised a lot but delivered nothing.
With Peter Spencer case coming up at the end of October, it will hopefully restore the value of the Constitution as our fore fathers intended it for protection for the people.
Posted by: Linda | October 17, 2013 at 10:49 PM
.... there are also many socialists in the Liberal Party ....
Close.
But no Cirio de Nazare Box for you, this year.
Since the power-grabbing Leninist/Maoist traitor, Whitlam, fascistically imposed Lenin's "keystone to the arch leading to the (fascis)socialist state" upon Australians, Australia has been irreversibly locked into The Road To Serfdom and -- but for John Singleton and a couple of others of us whose Workers' Party was libertarian and promised "medibank's" repeal -- every political party and every politician, since then, has been as fascistic as was Whitlam's. Australia's worst-ever.
And every government's a little more authoritarian-regulatory-fascist/statist than was the one before.
Posted by: Brian_R_Allen | October 17, 2013 at 10:52 PM
Democracy is something easily manipulated into something quite different from its original intent.
Representative democracy is not the same as direct democracy. Supposedly you vote for someone who "represents your views". Fine if there was only ever one issue, but what about when there are 10 issues - 1024 combinations of yes/no. 16 issues gives enough combinations for nearly everyone in an electorate to have a different "view"
>Who voted for the current speed limits?
>Who voted for our current set of judges?
>Who voted for the inflation target at the reserve bank.
In representative democracy you just get to choose your master, your actual opinion is not relevant at all. If you look at the Green's proposed model for the national parliament you will see how everybody can choose their favorite, but actually have no say at all.
The other manipulation is removing the independence of the courts and ignoring the constitution.
Posted by: Anton | October 17, 2013 at 11:19 PM
If you would like the evidence that has been gathered on the guilt of our politicians at all levels on Agenda 21 and SD visit The Galileo Movement website and look through Graham Williamsons meticulously documented reports.
The Commonwealth Government even produced a handbook for local councils "Our Community, Our Future - Local Agenda 21". Local Councils being the main implementation arm of the agenda, hence the rush to have another referendum on local govt. If they had succeeded, by hook or by crook in getting it passed the next step would have been working to have the states abolished. See the report by Richard Murray, ANZSOG, "The New Federation - A Cities and Regions Approach".
Posted by: Spiny | October 18, 2013 at 01:44 AM
Thanks for the comment Spiny
There are truckloads of information on the implementation of Agenda 21 and its off-shoots as practiced by local councils in Australia and elsewhere in the world.
Bringing this information to the attention of the general public and getting them to react to it is a major stumbling block in the effort to expose the part played by the two levels of government and the local councils in forcing Agenda 21 upon the people. As Anton said in an earlier comment, "The average citizen has been conditioned into doing nothing until it is too late."
What I am attempting to do is not flood the readers here with reams of information but rather to feed them the basics in four steps hopefully to alert them to the dangers of Agenda 21 and to inspire enough of them to contact their local council and start demanding some explanation.
You are right about the rush to have another referendum on the "Local Government" issue and it is not about directly funding local councils. Their intentions are far more nefarious and has more to do with "legalising" their abuse of power and recognising "Local Government" in defiance of the 1988 referendum that said NO in no uncertain terms.
Although introduced this time around by Gillard in an attempt to further her socialist intentions, both sides of politics are up to their necks in it.
They will attempt it again without doubt and it is therefore imperative that the general public are aware of what goverments, both federal and state, are really up to.
Posted by: Allan | October 18, 2013 at 09:59 AM
Not to labour the point, but some time ago, a friend of mine sent me an email warning about the (then) proposed referendum to include Local Government in the Constitution.
He said that if this happened, there would be nothing to stop a Local Council from introducing Sharia Law.
Would this be corect, possibly part of Agenda 21?
Posted by: AlterEgo | October 19, 2013 at 09:44 PM
This country is so far gone its beyond help.
We have a dumbed down government school educated populace totally incapable of sensing tyranny the gets its backside handed to it on a plate everyday yet can't figure out what the problem is.
If you conservatives thought that Tony Abbott was gonna 'fix it' you are in for a rude surprise, already there are warning sign from the likes of Julie Bishop with her commitment to 'SD' Tony Abbott negotiating the TPP in virtual secrecy, Joe Hockey on Raising Australias debt ceiling and then there is the big one which is the backflip on abolishing the carbon tax, when what we will get is a name change from carbon tax to an ETS, but we will still have a price on carbon.
The ALP are bad, but this mob of fake conservatives are every bit as bad and if not worse and the enemy of any freedom loving Australian.
Posted by: Adrian | October 20, 2013 at 01:09 AM
Tony Abbott negotiating the TPP in virtual secrecy
An early preview of the TPP :
http://www.bilaterals.org/spip.php?article15237
Looks like we are already the 51st state of the USA!
Posted by: AlterEgo | October 20, 2013 at 10:36 AM
I may be mistaken but I don't believe that the Islam and the United Nations are linked. I personally believe that they are in fact both shooting for the same goal - world domination.
It is likely that the United Nations are unintentionally assisting Islam by dumbing down education, encouraging population distribution with their so-called humanitarian refugee aid programmes and the distribution of wealth from the first world to the third world.
On the matter of "Local Government", the Federal and State governments within Australia have openly defied the wishes of the people clearly expressed in the defeat of two previous attempts to have the Constitution changed. They have unconstitutionally and in defiance of a majority NO vote recognised "Local Government" as a legitimate third level of government in Australia.
For those that don't agree with that then I would say have a look at questions 1 and 3 of the 1988 referendum and then ask yourself how your local council is able to write By-Laws, impose fines and apply taxes (your annual council rates). Your local council has no legislative authority to do any of those things. That poses a question as to why their actions are not being challenged?
An ex senior tax office bureaucrat, Richard Murray, has written a rather in depth proposal to completely re-write the Constitution, abolish the States and install in their place 24 super councils to manage Australia.
Murray's proposal, which also unconstitutionaly recognises local councils as a legitimate third level of government, is right out of the Agenda 21 handbook and like the IPCC reports was peer reviewed by academics within the SOG. In Murray's short biographical introduction he fails to mention is that he was nominated as the Alternative Executive Director of the IMF which, along with the World Bank, is an arm of the United Nations.
Posted by: Allan | October 20, 2013 at 11:12 AM
That would be this?
http://www.anzsog.edu.au/media/upload/publication/103_Research-paper-A-New-Federation-with-a-Cities-and-Regional-Approach-Richard-Murray-120912.pdf
Will take a while to read through - offered for anyone else who would like to.
Posted by: AlterEgo | October 20, 2013 at 11:46 AM
Correction: Alternative should read Alternate.
Posted by: Allan | October 20, 2013 at 12:07 PM
Allan
worth reading- Agenda 21 7th june 1971 The Founex report Geneva.
also klaus schwab 40 years of change.
Posted by: linda | October 22, 2013 at 03:49 AM