US States Outlaw United Nations Agenda 21

Allan asks the question, “Ask your local Council the question and see what sort of response you receive.” From experience you will likely get a blank stare because Local Agenda 21 has become “embedded” in law. It happened more than 20-years-ago and people don’t remember how or why it all happened. But, happen it did! GC.Ed@L.

 There are some who read my previous three articles on Agenda 21, “Sustainable Development” and World Government and believe that it is nothing more than an alarmist conspiracy theory that should be sniggered at because it really doesn’t exist except in the minds of fools.  Those more astute readers take the time to do some research of their own and discover that Agenda 21, the United Nations “Sustainable Development” plan, does actually exist and is much more insidious than most would imagine.

State Legislatures in the United States are far more advanced in fighting this scourge than we in Australia.  In the latest move and following the lead of Alabama, Oklahoma’s House of Representatives recently voted unanimously to introduce legislation that will protect private property rights from the United Nations and to outlaw Agenda 21 because it poses an unacceptable threat to liberty, values and sovereignty.  It has been reported that to date some 158 government authorities in various countries have outlawed Agenda 21.

The United Nations put Agenda 21 forward as a sustainable development initiative supposedly aimed at the protection of the environment, but nothing could be further from the truth because Agenda 21 has little to do with the protection of the environment and a lot to do with the abolition of private land ownership and property rights.  The more sinister aim is the complete transformation of the global economy in ways that are completely at odds with national sovereignty, individual liberty and traditions of self-governance.

The ultimate UN plan was outlined and agreed to by national governments and dictatorships worldwide at the 1992 “Earth Summit” in Rio de Janeiro. According to the UN, “Agenda 21 is a comprehensive plan of action to be taken globally, nationally and locally by organizations of the United Nations System, Governments, and Major Groups in every area in which human impacts (sic) on the environment,” the UN admits on its website, sparking suspicions from analysts who point out that virtually every aspect of human existence has some “impact” on the “environment.”  The answer, according to the UN, is to control every aspect of human life.

While the average Australian citizen is unaware of Agenda 21 and its true implications, not so the various levels of Government, Federal, State, and Local.  Shire Councils, have seen the advantage of adopting the socialist lie of ‘sustainable development’, but not for the benefit of their rate payers, and the more observant property owners, especially farmers, in our society would have noticed the slow but sure encroachment of local government regulation dictating what you can and can’t do with the property that you own.  Shire Councils are becoming more and more powerful and introducing more and harsher property and environmental by-laws that to most in the society would make little sense and are a long way short of believable justification. 

Australia has been part of Agenda 21 since Keating signed us up in 1992.  So, as signed up members of the Agenda 21 initiative you would think that our politicians, both State and Federal, plus our local governments would know all about it.  Well, you may think so, but try getting any information about Agenda 21, or ‘sustainable development’, from your local member or from your Shire Council and you will be confronted by a stone wall.  Ask your Shire Council if it is a signatory to Agenda 21 or ”Sustainable Development” and you will likely be treated like a leper. 

While here in Australia our various forms of government think they are keeping us in the dark and giving us the old ‘Mushroom” treatment, nothing could be further from the truth.  More and more citizens are becoming aware of this treasonous United Nations plan.   Is treasonous too strong a term?  Not at all.   When a foreign-based organization, aided and abetted by our own government, plans to remove your freedom, your constitutional rights, your property rights and the sovereignty of your nation then that is treason and if our politicians, bureaucrats and councilors are a part of it then they are surely committing treason?

How does your local council shape up?  Are they signatories to “Sustainable Development”.   If they are, then they are instruments of the United Nations that are following the dictates of Agenda 21.  Ask your local Council the question and see what sort of response you receive.

(Thanks to  Alex Newman, The New American) 

Alan is an ex-RAAF officer retired from active duty. He was a flight instructor and charter pilot. He also writes on matters political and is a staunch battler for ex-service superannuants. He is also rumoured to be a savvy fossicker for the yellow stuff.

 

 

 

 

Comments

[pk]

1.

Alabama & Oklahoma - World leaders in insular yokel belief of conspiracy theory, god and the gun and, in Alabama's case, still a place where marriage between cousins is legal.

Another great acts of law in these Alabama -

"Biology textbooks in Alabama have included a disclaimer describing evolution as a "controversial theory" since 1996.

Started building your shelter for when the UN decide to take over the world yet? Don't forget to pack extra tin foil.

[ibbit]

2.

Dream on, you arrogant, ignorant, idiot then go and do some research. Be prepared to be surprised at the number of councils - the main carriers of A21 in Australia - who are signed up to the UN Agenda 21.

Agenda 21 is not some benign little bagatelle. But idiots are not capable of understnaing things outside their ken. They just don't have the brains.

Typical Labor though, point an accusing finger at issues within a another country, whether correct or otherwise, as justification for wrong thinking. Clever tactic - for dills, that is.
As I said above, dream on you ignoramous.

[John Mc]

3.

Alabama & Oklahoma - World leaders in insular yokel belief of conspiracy theory, god and the gun and, in Alabama's case, still a place where marriage between cousins is legal.

Well what can you expect with Alabama. State politics have been dominated by Democrats up until the 90s. I'm sure you'll agree with me that now with the turn to Republicans at state level Alabama can now start to realise it's potential.

[pk]

4.

it's not a repub vs democrat nor lib v labor debate - it's a conspiracy loon vs the rest of the world debate

[Peter Simmons]

5.

I'll back the conspiracy loon over anything you believe in Chewing Gum.

[Allan]

6.

Ibbit, some of those commenting here believe that they are clever at pointing out what they consider to be 'issues' in other countries/relationships/governments/politics, ad infinitum. One such case is the claim that in Alabama allows marriage between cousins. I assume that is supposed to be a put-down and if it is then it has backfired in grand fashion.

In nearly every case of finger pointing there appears to be a total lack of real knowledge or any form of research. This is possibly because there is a distinct lack of mental capacity that would allow fact to be absorbed.

Consanguinity is also legal in every state in Australia. The drawback with marriage between close relatives is that there is more likely to be medical and mental problems with any resulting children and one has to wonder if that is not the problem with a contributor know to us all.

[kraka]

7.

I agree-certain commentators definitely show signs that their parents might be too closely related.
I assume the same numnums that scoff at the deep south have no problems with Tasmania :)

[Jim Simpson]

8.

Excellent article - And contrary to some half baked remarks above, the U.S. State of Alabama will soon be recognised as leading the charge among several other U.S. States who are actively finalising their own Legislation against Agenda21.

Wake Up Australia and also watch out for a third attempt at getting Local Councils recognised within our Constitution by way of a Referendum at the Federal Election on 14th Sept 2013!

We don't need a third level of bureaucracy, nor control of same via a foreign socialist agency of the UN that has already infiltrated virtually every Local Council over the past 20 years with Agenda21 hidden behind the Green Mask of Sustainable Development'.

Make the effort. Do a little research of your own. You will soon find there's more truth in this article than not and more to be concerned about if you value our sovereignty, freedom & property rights..

[Andy's RANT!]

9.

More info about A 21 can be found here:
http://www.andysrant.com/agenda-21/

[Geoff Crocker]

10.

Spot on, Jim. An excellent comment.

[RossCO]

11.

Agenda 21 and Green stupidity have infiltrated our Vic Park Council in WA.
We live in one of the first houses built in the street, lovingly hand built by Dad. He was ahead of his time and built with rendered handmade brick walls, timber floors and a concrete tile roof on timber trusses. If the house had been constructed of weatherboard or asbestos the council now prevents you from renovating to brick.
Our direct experience came with an application to build a skillion roof garage next to the main house. Many similar new structures exist in the suburb, but the council planning manager overrode the garage inspector’s opinion by adopting the new standard. First this requires us to use the same tiles.
I asked “where are we to source 60 year old concrete tiles no longer manufactured” and was told that we had to find similar ones. What a joke yet another rule that doesn’t work and costs more to boot!
The new rules require us to build a truss roof at the same pitch and join it into the existing 60 year old roof. Something we were trying to avoid! After all avoiding risking the integrity of an existing roof structure seemed to be the most sensible way to make any extension to the house.
Now we have to undertake this risky renovation just to keep the streetscape pleasing to our green agenda 21council.
I just want to send them the bill for the extra cost of all their new rules and any damage to the roof!

Other examples
Pavers - No concrete pavers allowed (the new rules enforce concrete tiles on the roof however!) and set colours.

Roof - no white - even though white is the most energy efficient roof colour