ACORN Playing Behind Scenes Role in 'Occupy' Movement

The former New York office for ACORN, the disbanded community activist group, is playing a key role in the self-proclaimed “leaderless” Occupy Wall Street movement, organizing “guerrilla” protest events and hiring door-to-door canvassers to collect money under the banner of various causes while spending it on protest-related activities, sources tell FoxNews.com.

Click here to read the full post.

 

 

 

Follow Andy on twitter

 

Comments

[Pip]

1.

ACORN/SEIU

These were originally groups set up by Saul Alinsky and the Chicago Industrial Areas Foundation. Saul Alinsky, an American Jewish Communist worked to achieve "revolution" by engaging with naive Catholic Parish priests in poor black areas of Chicago, Arkansas and through out America. Over 20 plus years they managed to defraud the Vatican of $8 billion until they were found out early in Obama's presidency. The Clinton's helped them along as well, good social justice Catholics that they are.

Obama worked with the same crowd before becoming President.

Acorn went under ground after their exposure, to return again now. The Chicago Industrial areas Foundation has now generated similar organizations in the UK and AUSTRALIA to develop CIVIL SOCIETY. You will recognise "the rob from the rich give to the poor modus operandi" used by Acorn being adopted in Carbon Trading, Agenda 21 etc.etc.

The Industrial Ares Foundation is training people here in Australia in the Saul Alinsky Methods under the umbrella of the SYDNEY ALLIANCE, strangely they have got Cardinal George Pell and the Governor of NSW to "partner" with them. These orgs. always get people to "partner" with them---it gives them a hell of a lot of legitimacy.

http://www.sydneyalliance.org.au/faq/

They have trained GetUp, plus all the other UN affiliated groups, POPPING UP DAILY, plus the OccupyWall Street mob.

How can we stop this?

The Tea party know about it but with useless candidates like Mitt Romney what hope have we?

As Vivienne noted in the threads on Agenda 21, why didn't the Howard Government do anything to stop this?
The reason is that the NeoCons are into this as well as the Progressives.

At the moment, it is only Tony Abbott, Cory Bernardi and maybe Eric Abetz who do not seem captive but what would happen if they came to power?

[captain catholic]

2.

Glenn Beck should apply his "investigative" journalistic tools to his religious ideology. Pass the golden plates.

[Andy Semple]

3.

Beck is weird but CNN is ok?

Beck just tells is as it is.

Read what Pip had to say above about Acorn - you might just learn something.

[captain catholic]

4.

you mean the bit about Mitt Romney being useless? Hey, hang on! He's a mormon too. I wonder if he wears the special mormon underpants too? (google it)

[captain catholic (no connection)]

5.

I note Cardinal ("without god we are nothing") Pell gets a mention too.

[Andy Semple]

6.

You're not worth responding too. Back to the Getup website for you

[oldskool]

7.

you my friend are a bigot.

[Andy Semple]

8.

captain catholic (no connection) is also a few bricks short of a load. I'm sure there is "no connection" between his ears too.

And you are right, he is a bigot too

[captain catholic]

9.

With respect Andy, there is quite a lot of, er..animosity on this site with regard to other ideas and views. Would you call that a form of bigotry? Or is it just religious ideology that is out of bounds. If someone agrees with the overwhelming majority of climate scientists on the planet, most contributors on this site would label them as suffering some sort of delusion and not to be trusted. But it seems to be ok to believe in ludicrous superstitions (tautology?) and still be considered a credible commentator or, even a potential leader of "the free world". Don't you see the dichotomy?
ps. I have never been to the Getup site.

[bluebell]

10.

For what it's worth Captain - A Carbon Tax will not save us. All this Tax is designed to do is to make people like Malcolm Turnbull and his investment banker buddies at Goldman-Sachs filthy rich. Also, don't forget the UN, they too will reap trillions in revenue from this, an organization well known for it's entrenched corruption. The Tax will decimate manufacturing and fleece retirees like myself. Already, my husband and I will be $210 OUT of pocket in the first year of this Tax's operation. We will have to go cap in hand to Centrelink and lay ourselves bare for the so called $300 Seniors Tax Offset. Yet those retirees holding a Commonwealth Seniors Card will get compensated to the tune of $510 per couple. Do you think that is fair? Some of these retirees are pulling just under $80,000 per year, yet we are on an allocated pension of $36,000 per year. It's the ordinary schmuck who is going to bear the burden, not the politicians or the so called captain's of industry. They will merely close down operations of high intensive energy needs in countries who bring this in and offshore. Rio Tinto are already in the plans of doing this. Industries like steel, refining, smelting and cement will close. We will in effect become a nation that produces nothing, while we sanctimoniously off shoring to those countries that have cheap labor, and burning OUR coal to do it. We are shooting ourselves in the foot and people like Andy knows it. Our politicians are in the game of feathering their own nests and living their post political lives in comfort at our expense. Alan Jones has laid bare the enormous bureaucratic industry that has developed around this Climate change industry. It is like an unstoppable hydra that will engulf obscene revenue streams. The West is technically broke....and so along comes the magic Carbon Tax/ETS trading scheme. If you think this is going to do anything about addressing global climate change you are dumber than I thought. This would have to be the biggest con in human history....and dumb sheeple like yourself are falling over themselves to sign up to it.

[captain catholic]

11.

QED.

[oldskool]

12.

captain catholic you are a bigot, what business is it of yours what type of underwear a politician wears? maybe your underwear should be discussed on this site.

[bluebell]

13.

QED

Meaning?

[captain catholic]

14.

If you were offended, I apologise. So it's ok to call Mitt Romney "useless" as Pip did (first post), but NOT ok to refer to the mormon penchant for wearing special underwear that , apparently ,wards off evil and is a symbol of their faith ?

[oldskool]

15.

captain catholic,

Answer- yes
but i think even someone of your ignorance can tell the difference between the 2 very different attacks on the politician in question

[captain catholic]

16.

Please excuse my ignorance and humour me. What IS the difference.

[oldskool]

17.

Captain catholic

i will play your game but i assume you know well the difference

one attack is based on an opinion as to the general incompetence of a politician.

Your attack however, is based on the religious affiliation of a politician.

one is acceptable but your attack is out of line.

[captain catholic]

18.

Okay, so an attack on a political affiliation is acceptable, but an attack on a religious affiliation is not. (just writing this down). What if there was a candidate who was a scientologist? Does xenu the intergalactic overlord deserve the same respect as the abrahamic god of the old testament? Just wondering where to draw the line.

[oldskool]

19.

the us constitution states that no religious test applies to political office

if the candidate is the best their religious affiliation is irrelevant

you captain catholic are completely out of line with your bigotry and sarcastic passive aggressive attitude

PS why you are so interested in the under wear of a candidate, it is absolutely none of your business what type of undies a candidate wears

[captain catholic]

20.

Seperation of church and state is an ideal. But could you ever envisage a muslim or atheist presidential candidate ergo religion does have a bearing (not suggesting atheism is a religion). My point is that if one has some irrational belief in the background that will influence decisions made on behalf of the general public, then those beliefs are fair game. Please justify them. A coherent defence would be appreciated.
ps. google "garmies"
(satire okay)

[oldskool]

21.

happy to see your sarcastic undertone is dimming.

every single religion has some kind of perculiarity about it.

one could say the same for Catholic sluces
Anglicans have monarch as their head of church
hundus worship animals

the list goes on

my understanding is that Romney's religion is quite mainstream with milions of adherents and the predominant religion in some states.

your penchant for undies is quite ridiculous